24 September 2011

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (11th nomination)

OK this is probably quite controversial, as this particular article has been nominated 10 times before. But please, consider these points.

  •  The subject of the article has strongly objected to there being an article about him.
  •  He is forced to check it every day for libel, slander etc.
  •  He has now been banned for trying to get the article removed.
  •  He has made an anti-Wikipedia website, and is a regular poster on the Wikipedia review. Probably both in response to this article.
  • Also, probably because of Wikipedia's popularity this article is first on a Google search. 

Please really consider your "vote", and don't "per" others here. I think this is a case where notability is irrelevant. I wish to end this silly battle once and for all with this, so the man can get on with his life. Majorly (Talk) 17:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

It's been 5 years Daniel. When are you going to get on with your life?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Brandt_(11th_nomination)

20 September 2011

Daniel Brandt supporters blackmailing Uncyclopedia administration with threats of real life harassment, or Truth in Humor

So I enjoy Uncyclopedia. It is a funny site on the Wikia network of wikis that is generally clean enough for children to read. Uncyclopedia includes a category on Daniel Brandt, the articles are mostly humorous lampoons on Brandt's hypocritical views that nobody is allowed to document his actions while he documents and exposes innocent people, encouraging online and offline harassment. One of the pages really hits close to home:
The text reads:


Help harass Wikipedia administrators

Many of the 900 Wikipedia administrators can be identified through advanced stalking
and illegal techniques. This will discourage editors from applying for adminship, and encourage others to be less considerate of those who would rather not be watched for the rest of their lives.


We need your help
If this is not a cry out for help from an editor who has been bullied by Brandt I don't know what it. Yes it is a comedy site, but it wouldn't be funny if it weren't true. This page was created 19:42, June 4, 2006over 5 years ago. Daniel Brandt has been at this for a long time.

Next I read the talk page where the creator of the menu and a Brandt supporter were arguing about the word "illegal" being included in the template. It is not illegal to accuse a person of doing something illegal, especially when it is the truth. While posting publicly available information may not be illegal, blackmail and harassment are against the law in every civilized western countryThe conversation:


It starts out innocently enough. The Daniel Brandt supporter explains his concern calmly and politely, but then when he doesn't get what he wants he goes straight to blackmail. If I had to guess I would say that Daniel Brandt was probably feeding his responses, but that is just my theory and there is nothing to back that up other than the language being used being almost identical to how Brandt speaks. It may be nothing more than his influence rubbing off on the editor.

The Brandt supporter then make this statement:
Regardless, anyone who's familiar with the situation isn't going to see "illegal techniques" as a deliberate or humorous exaggeration - phrases just like that have been used many times on Wikipedia lately to describe what Brandt is doing, by people whose sense of humor is a lot less well-developed than ours is (to put it charitably).
Now why would language like that be used many times on Wikipedia to describe what Daniel Brandt is doing? Why would honest, intelligent, normal human beings like the esteemed editors at Wikipedia use this language if it were not happening to them? Normal people don't call people criminals for no good reason (More reactions to Brandt's abuse from regular people in this post). Normal people do not accuse others of stalking them if it simply is not true. The poster then admits to Wikipedia user's lack of  humor (I am sure they have a sense of humor, however Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia so on-site it is all business), so you can surmise from that they are not joking.

What is fact, however is this:
OK, fine. I can certainly wait a while longer for y'all to realize what's (not) going on! I was just trying to look at the big picture, that's all. My point still stands regarding what will happen when Brandt finds out about this, though - there's a good chance he'll start "hive-minding" the admins here at Uncyc too, it'll be perfectly legal as long as he only quotes public sources and doesn't violate any copyrights, and let's face it - some of the admins here might not have covered their tracks sufficiently.  c • > • cunwapquc? 15:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

 When not getting his way he goes straight to blackmail. "If you don't remove this Daniel Brandt will start 'Hivemining' you next". This is the train of though Daniel Brandt has introduced into the MediaWiki world. Petty, spiteful blackmail for no other reason than to get his own way. Daniel Brandt has been taking hostages on the internet through fear for many years and it needs to stop.

All copyrighted work used by Fair Use license and credited to their original authors/producers. Email tips and stories to help@danielbrandtisstalking.me.

19 September 2011

Daniel Brandt's Wikipedia Hivemind Site

Here is a post that interested me mostly because it is personal. This is an excellent explanation of the inner psychology behind Daniel Brandt's Hivemind site, of which my name, picture taken from my private social networking page, date of birth, and many others with addresses, names of family and spouses and also current and former employers are all listed on. As a supposedly anonymous user on Wikipedia I felt that this was very invasive and tantamount to bullying. Daniel Brandt uses this site to publicly blackmail, harass and otherwise cyberbully good people for no good reason other than they do not share his twisted and hypocritical view on internet privacy (His view being that he deserves to have total privacy while nobody else gets any at all) .

Review: Daniel Brandt's Wikipedia Hivemind Site

Credit goes to the original author obviously.

ED is down again.

I just noticed that Encyclopedia Dramatica is down. I had a suspicion that Brandt might be behind this, not a far reach considering he was behind them going down every other time (I just realized the irony in me defending Encyclopedia Dramatica, if this was my 5 years ago Wikipedian self  I would not believe it, but I digress) so I went to check.  From the topic in their IRC it looks like my suspicion was right. At least the damage was minimal:

Topic On: [ #ed ] [ Encyclopedia Dramatica: Now with 400% more site crash | The reason we are down ---> [Daniel Brandt] ...again. Be right back tho it's not a big loss just a $25 a month proxy. | No public logging ]
Topic By: [ Meepsheep ]

Keep fighting the good fight guys.

Edit: I did talk to an ED sysop and they showed me a long unsigned list of complaints mailed to their host which matches exactly to another long list of complaints that was signed by Brandt from 2 months ago.

18 September 2011

Encyclopedia Dramatica: there is a joseph evers: Official Review of the JosephEvers Blog: http://josephevers.blogspot.com/ - Owned by Anonymous, Advised by Daniel Brandt

Here is a post from another person who was also a victim of Daniel Brandt. He/She doesn't want his or her experience published as they are trying to remain anonymous, but instead has decided to rebut the "stalker blog" that Brandt has openly admitted to working on:

encyclopedia dramatica: there is a joseph evers: Official Review of the JosephEvers Blog: http://josephevers.blogspot.com/ - Owned by Anonymous, Advised by Daniel Brandt

17 September 2011

On Daniel Brandt, censorship and misusing information to enable real life harassment for no good reason

This little blog has gotten a lot of attention for just one day. A reader just forwarded this to me a few minutes ago: http://pastebin.com/GBpRHVh5

I invite others to forward me their stories so I may share them too. Email them to help@danielbrandtisstalking.me

Daniel Brandt, Public Information Research, Internet Bully

I was browsing through the Encyclopedia Dramatica Forums when I came across a discussion where ED admin Zaiger is explaining his and ED's problems with a harassing individual named Daniel Leslie Brandt. This brought me back to my own days of being stalked and tortured by Brandt and my own listing on Daniel Brandt's Hivemind site. Zaiger makes some excellent points and provides sources to back up his arguments for not only Brandt stalking his family and friends, but also to the real reason behind Encyclopedia Dramatica (.com) closing, which not surprisingly was also Brandt's doing. Important posts will be reproduced here later on for those who do not wish to go to Encyclopedia Dramatica, although I do suggest clicking through and reading the entire thread, or at least the first 10 pages, to get the full context:

http://forum.encyclopediadramatica.ch/threads/sherrods-faggotry-was-the-greatest-thing-to-happen-to-ed-f.2768/